| Out of the Silent Planet / C. S. Lewis | ||||||
| Reviewed by Tal Cohen | Friday, 26 February 1999 | |||||
The plot looks simplistic at first: a man rushes to the aid of an innocent victim and ends up being kidnapped by a mad scientist (Prof. Weston) and his greedy accomplice. He is then taken, unwilling, to the planet Mars in a space vessel invented and secretly built by the scientist. Once on Mars, the victim, Dr. Ransom, discovers that he is to be given by his kidnappers as a human sacrifice to the native Martians. He manages to escape from his captives, and learns to survive on the red planet. This plot might make it look like the book would be perfectly at home with many other “adventure” science fiction works written, like it, in the 1930s. However, while most other SF adventures written back then are of no interest today, and few of them are actually remembered (most would be classified today as “pulp” science fiction), Out of the Silent Planet stands out as a sustaining work. The similarities between this book and most of its contemporaries end on the surface level. C. S. Lewis was, much more than a fiction writer, a Christian thinker. He wrote many non-fiction books dealing with Christianity, and his fiction books really deal with the same subject too. Out of the Silent Planet and its two sequels are no exception. The book is loaded with Christian symbolism and references. But among many other things, I found the book's most important aspect to be the discussion on the meaning of being hnau -- a conscious, intelligent being (human or otherwise). In its writing style, Out of the Silent Planet is an easy and enjoyable read. During Ransom's travels on Mars (called “Malacandra” by its natives), a level of suspense is always kept and the reader would probably find himself interested in the plot. The characters, however, are somewhat lacking. In this book, Lewis seems to create characters that are easily classifiable as “good” or “evil”. Prof. Weston is Lewis's “stock evil professor”: in his general behavior, in his attempt to use others as Guinea pigs, and even in his loss of sense and dignity in front of higher truths, Weston is remarkably similar to Uncle Andrew from The Magician's Nephew. Compare, for example, Andrew's denying behavior on the land of Narnia in front of the talking animals to Weston's behavior in front of the Oyarsa. An interesting aspect of the book, from a science fiction point of view, is that our hero, being a linguist, learns the language of the natives. In most other books, old as well as modern, if there is any verbal communications at all it is the aliens that learn our language (invariably English). The alien language is also actually discussed in the book, with a few words being used constantly for lack of English alternatives. A partial explanation is that Dr. Ransom is a philologist, and some people suggest that he was modeled after J. R. R. Tolkien (of Lord of the Rings fame), Lewis's close friend and a philologist himself. (Continued in review of Perelandra.) 
| ||||||
 |
 |
Robert Rauch
writes: Can we be serious for a minute? Out of the Silent Planet is a poor attempt for Lewis keep his Christian beliefs relevant in the modern world - where it seems inevitable that other intelligent life will be eventually discovered. It is sad to see him cling so desperately to his feeble beliefs and painful to watch him disparage scientific achievement though his misunderstanding of rationality and moral behavior. |
| [362] Posted on Thursday, 05 February 2009 at 16:44 GMT [Reply to this] [Permalink] |
|
|
Vince
writes in reply to Robert Rauch: Can we be serious for a minute? Well, whatever makes you tick. Fact is, Lewis is one of the most accomplished and renowned writers of the 20th century, in the realms of fiction, fantasy, non-fiction, and religion. I don't see what qualifications you have to make a judgment of his relevance and beliefs. |
| [365] Posted on Monday, 16 February 2009 at 17:26 GMT [Reply to this] [Permalink] |
|
|
(anonymous)
writes: I enjoyed this book. No matter what the relevance of Lewis' views when interpereted today, it remains that the conflict of ideolegies in the book is a deep subject in its own right, regardless of percieved agendas. Sometimes, reading a book that has an obvious leaning toward one way of thinking increasingly potent simply for its supposed bias. For me, integrity of writing like this isnt marred by that - true or not. |
| [379] Posted on Saturday, 18 April 2009 at 9:07 GMT [Reply to this] [Permalink] |
|
|
Camille J
writes: Would an athiest like this book & the others in the Trilogy? I am considering reading this trilogy-- I grew up on classic Sci Fi, & have always been intrigued by this set of books because of the cool illustrations on the covers of the set edition published ca. the 1960s. I want to expand my 'read [past tense] bookshelf' of classic Sci Fi's, so am considering reading this set. But, in researching C.S. Lewis, I've learned that he was very religious & that his religious-ness profoundly affected his writing. I've been an atheist since I was 14-- so my question is-- and this is put to other atheists: did you enjoy this set of books? Was the religious-ness of them so obvious & so overbearing that they were irritating to read? Did the books offer other intriguing ideas & concepts that sufficiently offset the religious overtones? (My fave book of all time is 'Men, Martians and Machines' by Eric Frank Russell cuz it's 'Hard Sci Fi' & has many intriguing ideas/concepts.) Thanks in advance, CJ |
| [399] Posted on Friday, 03 July 2009 at 3:44 GMT [Reply to this] [Permalink] |
|
|
Tal Cohen
writes in reply to Camille J: Would an athiest like this book & the others in the Trilogy? That really depends... Do you enjoy soft-core SF, at all? SF that focuses on philosophical questions, more than science and technology? If so, you might enjoy the first and third books. The second book, Perelandra, you might find tiresome (parts of it read like chapters from Psalms). |
| [400] Posted on Friday, 03 July 2009 at 5:51 GMT [Reply to this] [Permalink] |
©1997-2007 by Tal Cohen, all rights reserved. [About]
